City life is one of the most universal experiences of modern people, which is not to say that this experience represents all facets of modernity, but it is true that it does encompass its most problematic aspects. The city is a product and process, not to mention the driving force of modernization. It is axiomatic that modern Korean literature not only delves into the problems of the city, but also raises issues with modernity. The foremost tasks for studying modernity in Korean modern literature are analyzing how cities are constructed in modern Korean literature, and how much of the urban sensibility is manifested.
Korean modern literature had its birth in the city. If industrialization and capitalism can be construed to be some of the most apparent factors for the changes in modern Korean history, then the city is a cradle of political and economic problems as manifested through its living spaces. A critical aspect of modernity in Korean literature is that the city is a complex construct and yet people still live there. Korean modern literature reveals how its aesthetics were formulated in the city context, by people of the city. The city shows that modernity is not some abstraction, but something tangible with specific images and experiences. In Korean modern literature the problems of the city do not belong to a conceptual or ideological domain, but are something that can be experienced through incidents discovered in specific texts.
Munhakdongne Publishing Corp.
2008, 293p, ISBN 9788954606752
2. Ashes and Red
Pyun Hye-Young, Changbi Publishers, Inc.
2010, 260p, ISBN 9788936433734
3. Gente di Wonmidong
Yang Gui-ja, Cafoscarina, 2006
Baek Young Ok
Wisdomhouse Publishing Co., Ltd.
2008, 355p, ISBN 9788959132959
5. Mujin im Nebel
Kim Seungok, Peperkorn, 2009
The urban experience in Korean society is different from that in the West and therefore the method in which it is expressed in literature is also quite different. Urbanization in Korea took place during the special circumstances of colonial modernization and a dictatorship; accordingly, its process can only differ from those in the West. The problems of the city were first written about in Korean literature in the modernist works of the 1930s. That was because, analogous to 20th century Western literature, it was most apparent that urban life was fraught with tension and complexities through the perspective of modernism. Just like how the city life centered in Paris, New York, London, and Berlin was “translated” into literature, life in the 1930s Kyeongseong (the former name of Seoul as well the capital city of Joseon during the early colonial era) was the focal point of Korean early modernist literature. In the novels of the 1930s, the city appears not only as a spatial backdrop but also as an arena where poverty, crime, and conflict are integral aspects of an urban experience. However, the city at that time was depicted as mostly a smaller version of a colonial society where freedom was repressed.
It was only after the full-scale industrialization of Korea in the 1960s, when the population exploded in the capital city, that the urban novel became a full-fledged entity. The development of the city during the colonial era was subject to certain restrictions because of its special circumstances, whereas in the 1950s the restoration of the city from the destruction during the Korean War was far from complete. The main themes found in modern literature such as an individual’s loneliness, alienation, dissolution of society, and the breaking up of tradition were beginning to be dealt with in Korean novels of the 1960s. Kim Seungok represents one of the outstanding writers of this period who conveyed a new kind of literary worldview, sensibility, and writing style.
Seoul, Winter of 1964 is a book by Kim Seungok that delineates fear, ennui, and the thanatos drive of the individual against the backdrop of a metropolis called Seoul, and is also written in a stylish manner. The three male characters in the book each live a distinctively different life but all share one thing in common. All of them are alienated from the all-powerful system, as dictated by urban civilization, and feel strong despair and inertia as a result of their alienation. They desire to live a happy life while contributing to the betterment of society, but have great difficulty fulfilling their dreams. In order for them to be active participants in society, they must forsake their own ...